Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] worktree: Support `--orphan` when creating new worktrees
- From
Jacob Abel <jacobabel@nullpo.dev>
- Date
- Apr 20, 2023, 03:05 UTC
- Message-ID
- <wk2wpftowc7wqeaqrylxq7eci4bkmuffwu75h4qugxulcgsk2b@gw6ouq3g5g2j>
- In-Reply-To
- <20230417093255.31079-1-jacobabel@nullpo.dev>
On 23/04/17 09:33AM, Jacob Abel wrote:
> > [...]
I've noticed on the lore that this revision didn't continue the existing thread[1] for the patchset. It seems this is because the `In-Reply-To` header was stripped from the message due to a bug with the MTA/mail bridge I use on my dev machine [2].
Apologies for any confusion this may have caused.
For continuity purposes I can either:
A. RESEND the revision to the main thread with a note in the cover letter tagging the discussions from this thread so far.
B. Reply to [1] in the main thread to point to this thread and then eventually publish v10 in reply to that reply message in the main thread.
C. Reply to [1] in the main thread to point to this thread and then eventually publish v10 in reply to this cover letter.
Let me know which would be the least disruptive/most ideal way forward or if there is another way I should approach this.
Thanks.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/20230109173227.29264-1-jacobabel@nullpo.dev/ 2. https://github.com/ProtonMail/proton-bridge/issues/374