Re: [PATCH] reftable: pass pq_entry by address

Elijah Conners <business@elijahpepe.com> writes:

Do we have any hard guidance like "do not pass an data item whose size is larger than 64 bytes" in our coding guidelines? If not, make sure that the reference to 64 bytes does not look like one.

While this patch is not bad as a change, we are going to make a copy of the value with structure assignment at the leaf level, I am not sure how big a deal this is in practice.

In any case, wouldn't it make sense to make the "we pass reference not because we want to let the callee modify the value, but because the callee deep in the callchain wants to copy the contents out of it" parameter a pointer to a constant? I.e.

    void merged_iter_pqueue_add(struct merged_iter_pqueue *pq, const struct pq_entry *e)

Other than that, looking good.