Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Work on t3404 in preparation for rebase--helper

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: May 13, 2016, 17:57 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqa8jtaliw.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1605130835070.4092@virtualbox>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

Show 15 quoted lines

> Hi Junio,
>
> On Thu, 12 May 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> I took these separately already, and plan to fast-track them as they are
>> both "trivially correct"; I double checked that what I have match these
>> two, too.
>
> Oh, okay. I just wanted to make things easier for you, and now that I have
> a script to prepare patch series, it's really almost as trivial for me to
> send out a new iteration as it would be to update a Pull Request on
> GitHub.
>
> Do you want me to hold off with new iterations in the future until you
> clarified your preferred course of action?

No. You've been doing great. I just wanted to clarify what I did to your patch before I merge them separately to 'next' ahead of the remainder that you'd be sending out, expecting a possible course correction, e.g. "that would make it harder to queue the other patches yet to come, all of which would depend on both of them--it would be better to queue them on a single topic to be extended with these other patches, after all these two are not that urgent".