Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Work on t3404 in preparation for rebase--helper

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, 12 May 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> I took these separately already, and plan to fast-track them as they
> >> are both "trivially correct"; I double checked that what I have match
> >> these two, too.
> >
> > Oh, okay. I just wanted to make things easier for you, and now that I
> > have a script to prepare patch series, it's really almost as trivial
> > for me to send out a new iteration as it would be to update a Pull
> > Request on GitHub.
> >
> > Do you want me to hold off with new iterations in the future until you
> > clarified your preferred course of action?
> 
> No.  You've been doing great.  I just wanted to clarify what I did
> to your patch before I merge them separately to 'next' ahead of the
> remainder that you'd be sending out, expecting a possible course
> correction, e.g. "that would make it harder to queue the other patches
> yet to come, all of which would depend on both of them--it would be
> better to queue them on a single topic to be extended with these
> other patches, after all these two are not that urgent".