From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 17:57:27 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Work on t3404 in preparation for rebase--helper Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Hi Junio, > > On Thu, 12 May 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> I took these separately already, and plan to fast-track them as they are >> both "trivially correct"; I double checked that what I have match these >> two, too. > > Oh, okay. I just wanted to make things easier for you, and now that I have > a script to prepare patch series, it's really almost as trivial for me to > send out a new iteration as it would be to update a Pull Request on > GitHub. > > Do you want me to hold off with new iterations in the future until you > clarified your preferred course of action? No. You've been doing great. I just wanted to clarify what I did to your patch before I merge them separately to 'next' ahead of the remainder that you'd be sending out, expecting a possible course correction, e.g. "that would make it harder to queue the other patches yet to come, all of which would depend on both of them--it would be better to queue them on a single topic to be extended with these other patches, after all these two are not that urgent".