Re: [PATCH v2] Ignore dirty submodule states during stash
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 17, 2016, 17:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqa8joy5sv.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CABSveYgsRU+L5qvY_evwekaRU7-oL_2Mmxt6L1u2dYM7Xfq2rw@mail.gmail.com>
Vasily Titskiy <qehgt0@gmail.com> writes:
> You're right, it's redundant here. Should I resubmit the path without this line?
I wasn't pointing out that it was not needed. I was only asking what it was meant to do.
If you now think it shouldn't have been there, that merely means your code was wrong. It does not mean I'm right ;-)
With that line removed, would the patch now becomes right? Are there other bugs?