Re: [PATCH v2] Ignore dirty submodule states during stash
- From
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
- Date
- May 17, 2016, 16:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAPig+cSFD+4zhvxpqjGWomq1uW3JxCNi6pQP3f_bp4Tr1Kg5aA@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160517131635.GA5299@gmail.com>
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Vasily Titskiy <qehgt0@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> As stash does not know how to deal with submodules, > it should not try to save/restore their states > as it leads to redundant merge conflicts. > > Added test checks if 'stash pop' does not trigger merge conflics
/conflics/conflicts/
> in submodules. > > Signed-off-by: Vasily Titskiy <qehgt0@gmail.com>