Re: [PATCH 2/2] parse-options.c: use "enum parse_opt_result" for parse_nodash_opt()

>>> -	return -2;
>>> +	return PARSE_OPT_ERROR;
>>>  }
>>
>> The current caller only checks to skip a token that yields 0 (aka
>> PARSE_OPT_DONE) and does not distinguish between other values, so
>> this won't change the behaviour of the current code, but it is 
>> not clear if returning -1 (aka PARSE_OPT_ERROR) is better than -2
>> (aka PARSE_OPT_HELP).
>
> I think PARSE_OPT_ERROR is probably better.
>
> It looks like the -2 return value might have been somewhat blindly
> copy/pasted between 07fe54db3cd (parse-opt: do not print errors on
> unknown options, return -2 intead., 2008-06-23) and 51a9949eda7
> (parseopt: add PARSE_OPT_NODASH, 2009-05-07).
>
> I.e. we use the full enum values for the code in the former, but in the
> latter we're just looking for "not zero", so error/-1 seemed like a
> better fit.