Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] parse-options.[ch]: consistently use "enum parse_opt_result"
- From
SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 6, 2021, 19:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20211106191103.GA5811@szeder.dev>
- In-Reply-To
- <patch-v3-03.10-828e8b96574-20211008T190536Z-avarab@gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 09:07:39PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> Use the "enum parse_opt_result" instead of an "int flags" as the > return value of the applicable functions in parse-options.c. > > This will help catch future bugs, such as the missing "case" arms in > the two existing users of the API in "blame.c" and "shortlog.c". A > third caller in 309be813c9b (update-index: migrate to parse-options > API, 2010-12-01) was already checking for these. > > As can be seen when trying to sort through the deluge of warnings > produced when compiling this with CC=g++ (mostly unrelated to this > change) we're not consistently using "enum parse_opt_result" even now, > i.e. we'll return error() and "return 0;". See f41179f16ba > (parse-options: avoid magic return codes, 2019-01-27) for a commit > which started changing some of that. > > I'm not doing any more of that exhaustive migration here, and it's > probably not worthwhile past the point of being able to check "enum > parse_opt_result" in switch(). > > Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> > ---
Show 35 quoted lines
> diff --git a/parse-options.c b/parse-options.c
> index 9c8ba963400..f718242096c 100644
> --- a/parse-options.c
> +++ b/parse-options.c
> @@ -699,13 +699,14 @@ static void free_preprocessed_options(struct option *options)
> free(options);
> }
>
> -static int usage_with_options_internal(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *,
> - const char * const *,
> - const struct option *, int, int);
> -
> -int parse_options_step(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *ctx,
> - const struct option *options,
> - const char * const usagestr[])
> +static enum parse_opt_result usage_with_options_internal(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *,
> + const char * const *,
> + const struct option *,
> + int, int);
> +
> +enum parse_opt_result parse_options_step(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *ctx,
> + const struct option *options,
> + const char * const usagestr[])
> {
> int internal_help = !(ctx->flags & PARSE_OPT_NO_INTERNAL_HELP);
>
> @@ -839,10 +840,11 @@ int parse_options_end(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *ctx)
> return ctx->cpidx + ctx->argc;
> }
>
> -int parse_options(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
> - const struct option *options,
> - const char * const usagestr[],
> - enum parse_opt_flags flags)
> +enum parse_opt_result parse_options(int argc, const char **argv,The return type of this function should have been left unchanged, because it contains only one return statement:
return parse_options_end(&ctx);
and parse_options_end() does return an int.