Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] object-file.c: release strbuf in write_loose_object()
René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> writes:
Show 14 quoted lines
> There was no leak before. Both strbufs are static and both functions
> they are passed to (loose_object_path() and create_tmpfile()) reset
> them first. So while the allocated memory was not released before,
> it was reused.
>
> Not sure if making write_loose_object() allocate and release these
> buffers on every call has much of a performance impact. The only
> reason I can think of for wanting such a change is to get rid of the
> static buffers, to allow the function to be used by concurrent
> threads.
>
> So I think either keeping the code as-is or also making the strbufs
> non-static would be better (but then discussing a possible
> performance impact in the commit message would be nice).