git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] verify-tag: prepare verify_tag for libification

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
Apr 19, 2016, 19:36 UTC
Message-ID
<xmqq7fft1jcz.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To
<CAPig+cTO_vC1_N79G9yMkiyjYtEeBdsivz-A4jOMw0r-vRWWaw@mail.gmail.com>
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
> I'd have probably called this "display_name", but then I suppose it
> suffers the same issue Junio mentioned previously about it sounding
> like a boolean. Anyhow, as long as Junio is happy with it, that's what
> matters.

No ;-) I am just trying to help people come up with patches in a better shape. Somehow "display name" does not bother me as much as "report name" did. name_to_report may be a mouthful, but it conveys what it is clearly, and I think it is good enough.

Show 17 quoted lines
>
> This version of the patch is nicely improved. One nit below.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/builtin/verify-tag.c b/builtin/verify-tag.c
>> @@ -80,6 +83,8 @@ int cmd_verify_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>>  {
>>         int i = 1, verbose = 0, had_error = 0;
>>         unsigned flags = 0;
>> +       unsigned char sha1[20];
>> +       const char *name;
>
> Mentioned previously[1]: These two declarations could be moved inside
> the while-loop scope (below).
>
> [1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/291813
Yup.
Show 21 quoted lines
>
>>         const struct option verify_tag_options[] = {
>>                 OPT__VERBOSE(&verbose, N_("print tag contents")),
>>                 OPT_BIT(0, "raw", &flags, N_("print raw gpg status output"), GPG_VERIFY_RAW),
>> @@ -96,8 +101,12 @@ int cmd_verify_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>>         if (verbose)
>>                 flags |= GPG_VERIFY_VERBOSE;
>>
>> -       while (i < argc)
>> -               if (verify_tag(argv[i++], flags))
>> +       while (i < argc) {
>> +               name = argv[i++];
>> +               if (get_sha1(name, sha1))
>> +                       had_error = !!error("tag '%s' not found.", name);
>> +               else if (verify_tag(sha1, name, flags))
>>                         had_error = 1;
>> +       }
>>         return had_error;
>>  }
>> --
>> 2.8.0
Previous: Eric SunshineNext: santiago@nyu.edu
Message 7 of 11 in “Move PGP verification out of verify-tag”
  1. 0/6 Move PGP verification out of verify-tagsantiago@nyu.edu, Apr 19, 2016
  2. 1/6 builtin/verify-tag.c: ignore SIGPIPE in gpg-interfacesantiago@nyu.edu, Apr 19, 2016
  3. 2/6 t7030: test verifying multiple tagssantiago@nyu.edu, Apr 19, 2016
  4. 3/6 verify-tag: update variable name and typesantiago@nyu.edu, Apr 19, 2016
  5. 4/6 verify-tag: prepare verify_tag for libificationsantiago@nyu.edu, Apr 19, 2016
  6. Eric SunshineApr 19, 2016
  7. Junio C HamanoApr 19, 2016
  8. 5/6 verify-tag: move tag verification code to tag.csantiago@nyu.edu, Apr 19, 2016
  9. 6/6 tag -v: verfy directly rather than exec-ing verify-tagsantiago@nyu.edu, Apr 19, 2016
  10. Eric SunshineApr 19, 2016
  11. Eric SunshineApr 19, 2016

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.