Re: [PATCH] diff: stop output garbled message in dry run mode

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>> 
>> Yup, that matches my expectation more closely, which is
>> 
>> * We'll do the "send to /dev/null as we used to do before the
>>   dry-run thing" on the 'maint' front, which will be merged up to
>>   'master' and above.
>> 
>> * We'll queue "here are fixes to the recently introduced dry-run
>>   code" (without the /dev/null thing mixed in), and cook that in
>>   the usual 'seen' down to 'next' down to 'master' route.
>> 
>> In a distant future, we may consider removing the /dev/null thing
>> once the dry-run code path proves to be stable and robust.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>
> I am not sure what should I do. Should I make a new patch which
> only contains “fixes to the recently introduced dry-run code” without
> Peff’s code in it