Re: [PATCH] filter-branch: consider refs can refer to an object other than commit or tag
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 22, 2018, 17:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq370sm4cv.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <5ab3bd79.d14d650a.be5c0.8544@mx.google.com>
Yuki Kokubun <orga.chem.job@gmail.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
>> Yuki Kokubun <orga.chem.job@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> Yuki Kokubun <orga.chem.job@gmail.com> writes: >> >> >> >> > "git filter-branch -- --all" can be confused when refs that refer to objects >> >> > other than commits or tags exists. >> ... > > I meant the confusion is abnormal messages from the output of "git filter-branch -- --all".
OK, so it is not that the program logic gets confused and ends up performing a wrong rewrite, but mostly that it gives confusing messages.
Show 6 quoted lines
> For example, this is an output of "git filter-branch -- --all": > > Rewrite bcdbd016c77df3d5641a3cf820b2ed46ba7bf3b4 (5/5) (0 seconds passed, remaining 0 predicted) > WARNING: Ref 'refs/heads/master' is unchanged > WARNING: Ref 'refs/heads/no-newline' is unchanged > WARNING: Ref 'refs/heads/original' is unchanged
These are worth keeping, as I think existing users expect to see them.
Show 14 quoted lines
> error: object 1bf53b49c26465454e4ac377f2ed3f91bb1d6ac1 is a tree, not a commit > error: object 1bf53b49c26465454e4ac377f2ed3f91bb1d6ac1 is a tree, not a commit > fatal: ambiguous argument 'refs/replace/8a2016f3730cad8309c110f819c855403ed0a5b9^0': unknown revision or path not in the working tree. > Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this: > 'git <command> [<revision>...] -- [<file>...]' > WARNING: Ref 'refs/replace/8a2016f3730cad8309c110f819c855403ed0a5b9' is unchanged > WARNING: Ref 'refs/tags/add-file' is unchanged > WARNING: Ref 'refs/tags/file' is unchanged > error: object 1bf53b49c26465454e4ac377f2ed3f91bb1d6ac1 is a tree, not a commit > error: object 1bf53b49c26465454e4ac377f2ed3f91bb1d6ac1 is a tree, not a commit > fatal: ambiguous argument 'refs/tags/treetag^0': unknown revision or path not in the working tree. > Use '--' to separate paths from revisions, like this: > 'git <command> [<revision>...] -- [<file>...]' > WARNING: Ref 'refs/tags/treetag' is unchanged
I think these warning messages should be kept, especially if we are to keep the warning messages for the unchanged branches. However, the internal error messages are unwanted--these are implementation details that reach the conclusion, i.e. the ref we were asked to rewrite ended up being unchanged hence we did not touch it.
However, if we pre-filter to limit the refs in "$tempdir/heads" to those that are committish (i.e. those that pass "$ref^0") like the patch and subsequent discussion suggests, wouldn't we lose the warning for these replace refs and non-committish tags. We perhaps could do something like:
git rev-parse --no-flags ... >"$tempdir/raw-heads" || exit
while read ref
do
case "$ref" in ^?*) continue ;; esac
if git rev-parse --verify "$ref^0" 2>/dev/null
then
echo "$ref"
else
warn "WARNING: not rewriting '$ref' (not a committish)"
fi
done >"$tempdir/heads" <"$tempdir/raw-heads"(note: the else clause is new, relative to my earlier suggestion).