Re: [PATCH v4] fast-(import|export): improve on commit signature output format

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Jul 9, 2025, 15:35 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqq34b5pebr.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD1mgKT0AFuoYfisHMinP6KEDahcXCwiK6-wRFBKKymfsQ@mail.gmail.com>

Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:

Show 11 quoted lines

>> And I totally agree with you that reviews often deserve very well
>> reasoned responses, which take time to prepare; a response that
>> comes as spinal reflex without much thought is often not very
>> useful.
>>
>> It really depends on the definition of "fast" in "fast response".
>>
>> If we need a week to come up with a newer iteration,
>
> The issue is that whatever the time we could set as a norm, like "a
> week" here or 2 or 3 days, or one month, or whatever,

Yeah, topic sizes varies.

Historically, summer is a slower season and these messages I sent are primarily for me to keep track of topics on flight. "I am on vacation for a few more weeks so expect response time longer than usual" would have been a perfectly fine response.

Not even acknowledging receipt of review comments was what I primarily saw as a communication gap.