Re: [PATCH v2] date: detect underflow when parsing dates with positive timezone offset
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 5, 2024, 17:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq1q5bti4g.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <7ae05b6a-fb63-4ec7-8006-e968862cc5c7@gmail.com>
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks for taking a closer look, I wasn't aware of that. Reading > Peff's reply it seems like timestamp is actually unsigned and as we > limit the maximum year to 2099 it seems unlikely we'll overflow from > too larger date after all.
Thanks all.
I haven't seen one question I posed answered, though. Has https://git.github.io/htmldocs/SubmittingPatches.html#real-name been followed in this patch when signing off the patch?