From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 17:27:27 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] date: detect underflow when parsing dates with positive timezone offset Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7ae05b6a-fb63-4ec7-8006-e968862cc5c7@gmail.com> Phillip Wood writes: > Thanks for taking a closer look, I wasn't aware of that. Reading > Peff's reply it seems like timestamp is actually unsigned and as we > limit the maximum year to 2099 it seems unlikely we'll overflow from > too larger date after all. Thanks all. I haven't seen one question I posed answered, though. Has https://git.github.io/htmldocs/SubmittingPatches.html#real-name been followed in this patch when signing off the patch?