Re: [RFC/PATCH 4/4] t/t8006: test textconv support for blame
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Jun 4, 2010, 09:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqzkzb9lml.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTil7Y6PPkbmzuID4vY_fhEwvP4qa2UG5jC1qLtTG@mail.gmail.com>
Diane Gasselin <diane.gasselin@ensimag.imag.fr> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
>>> +test_expect_success 'setup ' ' >>> + echo test 1 >one.bin && >>> + echo test number 2 >two.bin && >>> + ln one.bin link.bin && >> >> Do you need a hard link? Can't you just copy the file at the right time? >> > > At first, we wanted to test how links handle textconv but it behaves > as regular file so the test is not really relevant. It will be > deleted.
You do want to test what happens for _symbolic_ links (stored as blob whose content is the target of the link IIRC). You probably don't want to run the textconv filter on link targets. I guess you meant "ln -s" here.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/