Re: [1.8.0] reorganize the mess that the source tree has become
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Jan 31, 2011, 21:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqwrlkg4r8.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vvd144wrl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Knee-jerk reaction: not very motivated to make the top-level directory > just a skeleton that holds various directories with a handful of > administrative files like Makefile, README, etc. Under your proposal, the > bulk of the current content at the top would simply move to another single > directory anyway, so I don't immediately see much point of such a move,
There would be at least one obvious benefit: currently, we have this
git$ ls | wc -l 623
(that's after a build)
It's a bit hard to find the interesting bits (README, Documentation/, contrib/ for example) in the output of "ls".
> other than adding merge burden on me and rebase burden on others, that > is.
That can be seen as a test of how good Git is at bulk rename management ;-).
All that said, I cannot really say whether the benefit is higher than the cost.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/