Re: moving to a git-backed wiki
- From
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 2, 2011, 10:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <AANLkTi=07yifUAQYqabA8Dv1qmBTe=50+BDN-b0YZ1zb@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <4D4929F4.3020805@snarc.org>
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Vincent Hanquez <tab@snarc.org> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On 01/02/11 22:48, J.H. wrote: >> >> The wiki will almost universally have a "central site" no matter what >> the backend. Personally I see little advantage to having a git backed >> wiki myself. > > with git based wiki, you can clone the whole wiki on your local machine, and > read/edit/commit on it locally using standard editor tool (i.e. $EDITOR). > and the history/revision/diff is completely built-in.
But there's no git based wiki (or any other wiki) that has even a fraction of the features that MediaWiki has, or IMO a markup format similarly sane.
-- Felipe Contreras