Re: GSoC 2016: applications open, deadline = Fri, 19/2
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Feb 12, 2016, 09:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqio1ucmyv.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <ED514A90-08AB-4EBC-BA17-ABAA06FE64FE@gmail.com>
Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> writes:
> I don't know what level of Git development knowledge and what amount of time > is necessary but I would be available as junior co-mentor :-)
AFAICT, you don't have much experience with Git's codebase itself (if I don't count git-p4 as "Git itself"), but you've already been involved in typical reviewing cycles (just the discussions on Travis-CI were a good example), and that is something at least as important as knowing the codebase well. It's up to you to decide whether you feel experienced enough, but I think you are welcome as a co-mentor!
As a mentor, to me, the most important things are:
* Give advice on how to interact with the Git community. Students can be shy, and then repeating "you should post more to the mailing-list" can be useful. They sometimes make mistakes, and explaining off-list "there's nothing wrong with what you did, but the custom here is to ..." can help.
* Give advice on how to get useful code merged. My usual advice is: "don't be too ambitious", which translates to "git this part done, reviewed and possibly merged, you'll work on the bells and whistles later".
* Avoid overloading the list with reviews. Getting your own GSoC tee-shirt and letting the list do the work is unfair ;-). Off-list reviews are good to eliminate straightforwards issues, and then mentors should actively participate to the on-list review. That is probably what takes most time.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/