Re: GSoC 2016: applications open, deadline = Fri, 19/2
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Feb 20, 2016, 09:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.1602201027170.20796@bonsai2>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq8u2gcubh.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Hi Junio,
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> The "experimenting" would include mergy operations like "am -3" and > "cherry-pick". "After queuing a topic and trying it in isolation, an > attempt to merge to the baseline results in quite a mess, and I give > up"--there is nothing to salvage. > > And obviously, "stash" is not useful in such a situation.
I think this is more a short-coming of "stash" than anything else.
Many a times did I wish I could simply quickly stash a failed merge and then come back later. Or not. Just like stashed changes without conflicts allow me to do already.
Ciao, Dscho