Re: [PATCH] git svn : hook before 'git svn dcommit'
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Jul 2, 2011, 21:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqfwmos5sg.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <4E0F5485.9010201@gmail.com>
Frédéric Heitzmann <frederic.heitzmann@gmail.com> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Le 02/07/2011 15:54, Matthieu Moy a écrit : >> Frédéric Heitzmann<frederic.heitzmann@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> The 'pre-svn-dcommit' hook si called before 'git svn dcommit', which aborts >>> if return value is not zero. >>> --- >>> git-svn.perl | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ >> What about documentation? > Should documentation be part of githooks or git-svn man page ? > I vote for the latest, in order to avoid
I'd also put it in the git-svn page, since git-svn is somehow not really part of Git.
> +prevent some diff to be committed to a SVN repository.
I'd say "an SVN", not "a SVN", but the documentation already use both forms.
Show 10 quoted lines
>>> + if ($? == -1) {
>>> + print "[pre_svn_dcommit_hook] failed to execute $hook:
>>> $!\n";
>> whitespace damage (extra newline)
>>
>
>As for the 'whitespace damage", I do not understand what you mean.
>The \n look mandatory to me.
>You may look at 'info perlfunc' for the original code snippet (see
>system' function).I'm not talking about the \n, but the fact that what used to be a single line of code is broken in two parts in your message.
A patch hunk has lines starting with " ", "+" or "-", yours have a line starting with $. It won't apply with "patch" or "git apply", hence extra work for our maintainer.
Try using "git send-email" to avoid that.
And actually, read Documentation/SubmittingPatches, in particular the part about Signed-off-by.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/