Re: [1.8.0] use 'stage' term consistently
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- May 9, 2012, 17:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqehqtferq.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s0DRrqMdHzOBTeQGmKtP7LzFerLZTaNgbHfj0XtebW9wA@mail.gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> The word "index" is quite well understood: that which points at the >> information given a headword that refers to it, which is exactly what the >> "index" we have is. On the other hand, "to stage/staging area" is not as >> widely used outside the narrow shipping/logistics circles. > > That's what git has, *internally*, but that's not how high-level users > interact with it.
I agree with that. Explaining users that the <whatever you call it> is the place where you stage content in preparation for the next commit is much more productive than explaining that it is an array of (name, sha1sum) pairs.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/