Re: [1.8.0] use 'stage' term consistently
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 21, 2012, 01:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120521013234.GA3055@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s1Bghc6zXRQ7fJxJORiHqAgs5dg-8_cp_FoChnBG7oD4w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Felipe,
Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Indeed, but you are missing the important part; everything else in > that sentence.
You're probably onto something, but I'm missing the point in your message. Could you repeat, carefully explaining:
- what change you would like to propose in git - whether it is backward compatible, and if it is not, what transition plan you propose - briefly, the rationale behind the change, in such a way as to convince skeptics like me that it is a good idea and to recruit us to help in your cause
? For that third part, a good example to take inspiration from is the project to improve Linux to function as a real-time operating system. Each change is so well justified _individually_ that someone not interested at all in that goal can still not help but agree with the changes!
Perhaps your message includes these elements already, but I found it hard to follow, hence this request.
Thanks, Jonathan