Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2010, #01; Tue, 9)
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Nov 9, 2010, 20:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqd3qe5jxs.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vbp5ymfyo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> * mm/phrase-remote-tracking (2010-11-02) 10 commits > - git-branch.txt: mention --set-upstream as a way to change upstream configuration > - user-manual: remote-tracking can be checked out, with detached HEAD > - user-manual.txt: explain better the remote(-tracking) branch terms > - Change incorrect "remote branch" to "remote tracking branch" in C code > - Change incorrect uses of "remote branch" meaning "remote-tracking" > - Change "tracking branch" to "remote-tracking branch" > - everyday.txt: change "tracking branch" to "remote-tracking branch" > - Change remote tracking to remote-tracking in non-trivial places > - Replace "remote tracking" with "remote-tracking" > - Better "Changed but not updated" message in git-status > > Is everybody happy with this round? I'd prefer to merge it to 'next' or > even 'master' and have further polishing be done, if necessary, > in-tree.
The version in pu is the right one (I have to admin I did not make the task easy ;-), thanks. I didn't get comment for a while, so I guess it's OK for next, or master if you want.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/