Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2010, #01; Tue, 9)

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> 
> > * mm/phrase-remote-tracking (2010-11-02) 10 commits
> >  - git-branch.txt: mention --set-upstream as a way to change upstream configuration
> >  - user-manual: remote-tracking can be checked out, with detached HEAD
> >  - user-manual.txt: explain better the remote(-tracking) branch terms
> >  - Change incorrect "remote branch" to "remote tracking branch" in C code
> >  - Change incorrect uses of "remote branch" meaning "remote-tracking"
> >  - Change "tracking branch" to "remote-tracking branch"
> >  - everyday.txt: change "tracking branch" to "remote-tracking branch"
> >  - Change remote tracking to remote-tracking in non-trivial places
> >  - Replace "remote tracking" with "remote-tracking"
> >  - Better "Changed but not updated" message in git-status
> >
> > Is everybody happy with this round?  I'd prefer to merge it to 'next' or
> > even 'master' and have further polishing be done, if necessary,
> > in-tree.
> 
> The version in pu is the right one (I have to admin I did not make the
> task easy ;-), thanks. I didn't get comment for a while, so I guess
> it's OK for next, or master if you want.