Re: Rebasing stgit stacks
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:30:18AM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote:
>> I'm all for calling this command "stg rebase".
>
> After all, my current implementation as "pull --to" mostly bypasses
> the fetch, so it probably makes sense to use a new command.
>
> However, "stg rebase <target>" does not sound right. I'm not very
> happy with "stg rebaseto <target>" (or rebase-to) either.
I think something 'stg rebase <newbase>' sounds OK.
--
Catalin