Re: Rebasing stgit stacks
- From
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
- Date
- Jan 17, 2007, 20:53 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070117205301.GH9761@nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <eojn5c$v9u$1@sea.gmane.org>
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:30:18AM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> I'm all for calling this command "stg rebase".
After all, my current implementation as "pull --to" mostly bypasses the fetch, so it probably makes sense to use a new command.
However, "stg rebase <target>" does not sound right. I'm not very happy with "stg rebaseto <target>" (or rebase-to) either. "stg rebase --to <target>" may feel strange too (command without non-option arg), but may finally a good choice after all ? What do others think ?
Best regards,
-- Yann.