From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:06:20 GMT
Subject: Re: Rebasing stgit stacks
Message-ID: <tnxmz4gv8sj.fsf@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070117205301.GH9761@nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net>

Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 12:30:18AM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote:
>> I'm all for calling this command "stg rebase".
>
> After all, my current implementation as "pull --to" mostly bypasses
> the fetch, so it probably makes sense to use a new command.
>
> However, "stg rebase <target>" does not sound right.  I'm not very
> happy with "stg rebaseto <target>" (or rebase-to) either.

I think something 'stg rebase <newbase>' sounds OK.

-- 
Catalin