Re: [ANNOUNCE] tig-0.14

From: Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 16, 2009, 15:14 UTC
Message-ID: <slrngpj0md.e6h.sitaramc@sitaramc.homelinux.net>
In-Reply-To: <2c6b72b30902160410g25e80514q318b65ea4614cdc1@mail.gmail.com>

On 2009-02-16, Jonas Fonseca <jonas.fonseca@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines

> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 02:33, Sitaram Chamarty <sitaramc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2009-02-15, Jonas Fonseca <jonas.fonseca@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> patchset. One idea I would like to explore is to provide a compressed
>>> version of the main view, where "intermediate" commits are hidden,
>>> this way you could easily get a view of the relationship between
>>> branches.
>>
>> like 'gitk --simplify-by-decoration --all'?
>
> Great, didn't know about this option. If only tig could show the

'git log' acquired it recently, or more precisely git rev-list did, I think.

> revision graph properly ... ;)

Yes I was going to ask about that, having been confused by the graph once in a while. You may want to consider using a few other characters than the 4 you currently do (if indeed that is the problem).

I'm interested in this too, and I do sometimes have complex branch relationships in my work. I'm no longer much of a C programmer but I can certainly help test.