From: Sitaram Chamarty Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:14:21 GMT Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] tig-0.14 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <2c6b72b30902160410g25e80514q318b65ea4614cdc1@mail.gmail.com> On 2009-02-16, Jonas Fonseca wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 02:33, Sitaram Chamarty wrote: >> On 2009-02-15, Jonas Fonseca wrote: >>> patchset. One idea I would like to explore is to provide a compressed >>> version of the main view, where "intermediate" commits are hidden, >>> this way you could easily get a view of the relationship between >>> branches. >> >> like 'gitk --simplify-by-decoration --all'? > > Great, didn't know about this option. If only tig could show the 'git log' acquired it recently, or more precisely git rev-list did, I think. > revision graph properly ... ;) Yes I was going to ask about that, having been confused by the graph once in a while. You may want to consider using a few other characters than the 4 you currently do (if indeed that is the problem). I'm interested in this too, and I do sometimes have complex branch relationships in my work. I'm no longer much of a C programmer but I can certainly help test.