Re: [PATCH] commit: teach --gpg-sign option
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 04:18:49PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org> writes:
> > Workflow example:
> > 1. Dev1 creates a commit, signs it, pushes to central repo.
> > 2. Dev2 pulls, signs the tip commit, pushes it back.
>
> I personally am not sympathetic to such a "sign every and all commits by
> multiple people" workflow. If you really want to do such a thing, you can
> have the second and subsequent one to create a new commit on top whose
> sole purpose is to hold such a signature (commit --allow-empty --gpg-sig),
> or use signed tags.
For this case, I think having the push certificates works much better.
No easy solution to all of this, just lots of yak-shaving :-(.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85