Re: [PATCH] cmake: ignore generated files

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> >> Good to catch these cruft.
> >>
> >> Does the equivalent of "make distclean" need to be updated to clean
> >> them as well, or is it sufficient to ignore the build procedure and
> >> just rely on "git clean -f -x"?
> >
> > Since CMake in conjunction with Visual Studio completely side-steps
> > `make`, I think it would make most sense to ignore `make distclean` in
> > this context and go for `git clean -dfx` instead.
>
> I think you misunderstood the question, overlooking the "equivalent"
> part.
>
> I expected that when CMake & VS discards build artifacts, it would
> not make literal use of "make distclean".  After all, it does not
> use "make all" to build, either.
>
> That led me to suspect that CMake & VS may have a build target that
> is used to discard build artifacts, the moral equivalent to "make
> distclean".  That is where my question "if we are making .gitignore
> aware of more crufts, don't we need to tell the machinery, which is
> equivalent to 'make disclean', came from.
>
> What I am hearing here is that people with CMake & VS use "git clean
> -dfx" when they want to go back to the pristine state, unlike those
> who use "make distclean", and there is nothing to adjust for newly
> discovered crufts we are leaving on the filesystem.