Re: [PATCH v2 18/24] gpg-interface: improve interface for parsing tags

> On 2020-02-25 at 10:29:26, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 22 Feb 2020, brian m. carlson wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/ref-filter.c b/ref-filter.c
> > > index 6867e33648..212f1165bb 100644
> > > --- a/ref-filter.c
> > > +++ b/ref-filter.c
> > > @@ -1161,7 +1161,13 @@ static void find_subpos(const char *buf,
> > >  			unsigned long *nonsiglen,
> > >  			const char **sig, unsigned long *siglen)
> > >  {
> > > +	struct strbuf payload = STRBUF_INIT;
> > > +	struct strbuf signature = STRBUF_INIT;
> > >  	const char *eol;
> > > +	const char *end = buf + strlen(buf);
> > > +	const char *sigstart;
> > > +
> > > +
> > >  	/* skip past header until we hit empty line */
> > >  	while (*buf && *buf != '\n') {
> > >  		eol = strchrnul(buf, '\n');
> > > @@ -1174,13 +1180,14 @@ static void find_subpos(const char *buf,
> > >  		buf++;
> > >
> > >  	/* parse signature first; we might not even have a subject line */
> > > -	*sig = buf + parse_signature(buf, strlen(buf));
> > > -	*siglen = strlen(*sig);
> > > +	parse_signature(buf, end - buf, &payload, &signature);
> > > +	*sig = strbuf_detach(&signature, siglen);
> >
> > While I like the spirit of this patch, it makes the Windows build fail. I
> > put this on top of Git for Windows' `shears/pu` branch to fix it (maybe
> > you could adopt a variation of it?):
>
> I'm happy to squash this in.  Sorry for the breakage, and thanks for
> catching this.