Re: git-ls-files --added?
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 24, 2009, 08:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <m3fxeudhho.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
- In-Reply-To
- <2cfc40320905240054j2c08da8bt4df95c6f1bc9e254@mail.gmail.com>
Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Is there a reason why git-ls-files does not have an --added option? > > I'd like to get a list of new files, due to be committed. Currently, I > have to parse the output of git status to get that, but it seems like > a reasonable function for git-ls-files.
You can use git-diff-* with --name-only and --diff-filter=A for that; you shouldn't parse result of porcelain git-status.
And there is also contrib/examples/git-commit.sh as a guideline...
-- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git