From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:37:11 GMT
Subject: Re: git-ls-files --added?
Message-ID: <m3fxeudhho.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <2cfc40320905240054j2c08da8bt4df95c6f1bc9e254@mail.gmail.com>

Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> writes:

> Is there a reason why git-ls-files does not have an --added option?
> 
> I'd like to get a list of new files, due to be committed. Currently, I
> have to parse the output of git status to get that, but it seems like
> a reasonable function for git-ls-files.

You can use git-diff-* with --name-only and --diff-filter=A for
that; you shouldn't parse result of porcelain git-status.

And there is also contrib/examples/git-commit.sh as a guideline...

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git