Re: git-ls-files --added?

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: May 25, 2009, 06:33 UTC
Message-ID: <7vws85y9n7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <7vmy921i3j.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

Show 11 quoted lines

> Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> writes:
> ...
>> I am still interested in the rationale for git-ls-files not supporting
>> such an option directly, since git-diff still seems a little indirect.
> 
> Partly historical, but more fundamental reason is because ls-files
> plumbing is about the index.
> ...
> Added is _not_ about comparision between the index and the work tree.  It
> is between the HEAD commit and the index, and it does not belong to
> ls-files plumbing.

Having said all that, I think you might be interested in pursuing

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/97830/focus=99134

Also, the following thread may serve as a food for thought; it shows that there is real need for some concise, easy to parse output for people who want their own Porcelain.

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/106122/focus=108110

In short, ls-files and diff-index _can_ give you what you want, but often people would want information from both, consolidated.