git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Gitweb 1.7.5 and Textconv Configuration

From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date
Jul 2, 2011, 20:23 UTC
Message-ID
<m3aacw5t5x.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To
<20110702195735.GA15542@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 20 quoted lines
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 10:18:55PM +0300, Al Haraka wrote:
> 
> > > which will make the repository-wide non-version-controlled gitattributes
> > > the same as the last committed version. The problem is that it won't be
> > > automatically updated as you commit and push changes to .gitattributes.
> > 
> > I thought my plan was to try and avoid this by using the
> > core.attributesfile directive, forcing this stuff to operate system
> > (well, account, besides the point here) wide on all repos with
> > specifying a .gitattributes (or, since it base bare, as you pointed
> > out yourself, $GIT_REPO_DIR/info/attributes) every single time.  Did I
> > misunderstand the mailing list thread that mentioned this a while
> > back?
> 
> Ah, I see. That seems like a reasonable solution. Are you sure that the
> user running gitweb as a CGI is the same as the user you log in as? That
> is, are you sure that ~/.gitconfig is being parsed when it is called as
> a CGI, and it's not looking in ~www/.gitconfig or something?
> 
> It would depend how your hosting is set up.
Well, there is also system wide $(prefix)/etc/gitconfig file...
 
Show 10 quoted lines
> > This is the reason I went through the trouble of compiling an updated
> > version in my account (as opposed to the installed version on the
> > Dreamhost box; they are stuck at version 1.7.1.1; I saw this mentioned
> > on a thread somewhere and wanted to get the "latest" (well latest
> > stable version) to avoid this kind of problem?  Was that the right
> > thing to do?  Will it even work in this case?  I get the feeling from
> > your response I was expecting a lot with RTFM'ing more.
> 
> It sounds like it should work to me, but I've not tested it (nor do I
> even run gitweb; I just have an interest in textconv).

The question is if --textconv works with git-diff-tree, because that is what gitweb uses.

BTW. we could use --textconv in 'blob' and 'blame' views (it is documented that git-cat-file supports --textconv, and it is checked in git testsuite but not documented that git-blame supports --textconv). But it would require changes to gitweb.

Hoping that this email will made it...
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
Previous: Jeff KingNext: Jeff King
Message 8 of 13 in “Gitweb 1.7.5 and Textconv Configuration”
  1. Al HarakaJul 2, 2011
  2. Jeff KingJul 2, 2011
  3. Jeff KingJul 2, 2011
  4. Al HarakaJul 2, 2011
  5. Jeff KingJul 2, 2011
  6. Al HarakaJul 2, 2011
  7. Jeff KingJul 2, 2011
  8. Jakub NarebskiJul 2, 2011
  9. Jeff KingJul 2, 2011
  10. Jakub NarebskiJul 2, 2011
  11. Al HarakaJul 2, 2011
  12. Jakub NarebskiJul 6, 2011
  13. docs: document --textconv diff optionJeff King, Jul 6, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.