Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c)
- From
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
- Date
- Sep 3, 2010, 19:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <m2r5ha7gri.fsf@igel.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100903193309.GC29821@pengutronix.de>
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes:
> Still GNU patch should then already fail in --dry-run mode.
Since --dry-run doesn't actually perform any changes it can easily be fooled when a file is patched twice.
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."