Re: [BUG?] rename patch accepted with --dry-run, rejected without (Re: [PATCH V3] arm & sh: factorised duplicated clkdev.c)
- From
- Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
- Date
- Sep 4, 2010, 00:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20100904000348.GA7498@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100903193309.GC29821@pengutronix.de>
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:33:09PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> > git patches include additional metadata for renaming files, which gnu patch > > will not understand. > > > > If you want GNU patch compatible diffs, don't use -C or -M when generating > > patches out of git. > Still GNU patch should then already fail in --dry-run mode.
And now look at the patch - it touches arch/sh/include/asm/clkdev.h twice. Once to remove it and once as a rename.
GNU patch not in --dry-run mode will first remove arch/sh/include/asm/clkdev.h, and then not have a file to deal with when it tries to patch the rename part. Whereas with --dry-run, the file stays around.
As I say, it's because GNU patch doesn't (currently) understand GIT patches. I wouldn't call that a bug in GNU patch.