Re: Specifying revisions in the future
- From
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
- Date
- Feb 5, 2012, 21:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <m21uq9x8q2.fsf@igel.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpqipjlf309.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
> "the successor of <commit>", OTOH, is not well defined, since there can > be several successors, and one can't order them reliably (you can't > really know the set of successors, because they can exist in different > repositories).
Yet it would be nice to have a concise notation for "the nth successor of <commit> towards <commit>" (using --first-parent ordering when ambiguous).
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."