Re: Specifying revisions in the future
- From
Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
- Date
- Feb 6, 2012, 04:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <buosjiozity.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <m2obtcx4i2.fsf@igel.home>
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> The rule should be to follow the leftmost parent as far as possible. > That means that X+2->D is B.
It might also be reasonable (and safer -- the user may not actually realize when there's an ambiguating branch-point) to simply have it abort with an error ("ambiguous future-ref specification") when there's any doubt... I suspect most uses would be very simple "+1" etc., and not crossing branch points.
-miles
-- `There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.'