Re: Specifying revisions in the future
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 5, 2012, 21:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v7h01eybe.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <m21uq9x8q2.fsf@igel.home>
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes: > >> "the successor of <commit>", OTOH, is not well defined, since there can >> be several successors, and one can't order them reliably (you can't >> really know the set of successors, because they can exist in different >> repositories). > > Yet it would be nice to have a concise notation for "the nth successor > of <commit> towards <commit>" (using --first-parent ordering when > ambiguous).
I thought that 47 different people can build on Linux v3.2 and when you ask the children of v3.2^0, you would not know which ones to show in what order, let alone "concise notation to pick one at random among them".
Did you mean --first-child?