Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] log: add default decoration filter
- From
Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
- Date
- Sep 8, 2022, 21:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <kl6lr10l8t7y.fsf@chooglen-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <c249bface2a6dcd0355620f92579b42a6fa4ea58.1659722324.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
"Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
Show 16 quoted lines
> From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com> > > When a user runs 'git log', they expect a certain set of helpful > decorations. This includes: > > * The HEAD ref > * Branches (refs/heads/) > * Stashes (refs/stash) > * Tags (refs/tags/) > * Remote branches (refs/remotes/) > * Replace refs (refs/replace/ or $GIT_REPLACE_REF_BASE) > > Each of these namespaces was selected due to existing test cases that > verify these namespaces appear in the decorations. In particular, > stashes and replace refs can have custom colors from the > color.decorate.<slot> config option.
I _just_ noticed that refs/bisect/* isn't part of this list, but I'd presume that users want to see those decorations (or I do, at least). Was that an intentional omission?