Re: Using the --track option when creating a branch

From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date: Oct 30, 2008, 23:24 UTC
Message-ID: <gedfmt$q9c$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <2008-10-30-15-23-16+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net>

[Cc: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>, Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>,
     git@vger.kernel.org]

Samuel Tardieu wrote:

Show 24 quoted lines

> * Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> [2008-10-30 15:06:16 +0100]
> 
>> --all pushes all refs, even the non-matching ones, which is very
>> rarely desirable and only accidentally sometimes the same as "push all
>> matching refs".
>>
>>> I know that I've never had the intent to push all the refs without
>>> thinking about it first. Most of the time, I intend to push only
>>> the current branch I am in.
>>
>> Then say so. There's a very simple command syntax for it:
>> "git push <remote> <current-branch>"
> 
> I update the branches I'm working in maybe 20 times a day, sometimes
> more. When I make a change and all the tests pass, I prefer to call
> 
>   git push
> 
> rather than
> 
>   git push origin 2.0-beta1
> 
> (and "2.0-beta1" is a short name here, some branches have much longer
> names)

You can use

  $ git push origin HEAD

and I think (but I am not sure) that there is DWIM-mery allowing to simply say

  $ git push HEAD

and it would use configured branch.$(git symbolic-ref HEAD).remote

And if it is not as I said, the patches would better made it so, instead of changing default behavior from push matching refspecs to push current branch only.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git