Re: Using the --track option when creating a branch

> * Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> [2008-10-30 15:41:07 +0100]
> 
> | On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 02:23:16PM +0000, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> | > I think it would be better to have :
> | > 
> | >   git push                <= push the current branch
> | >   git push --all          <= push all matching refs
> | >   git push --all --create <= push all matching refs, create if needed
> | > 
> | > The latest command is probably used so rarely (compared to the others)
> | > that it wouldn't be a problem to make it longer. Of course, if a
> | > refspec is given explicitely, it should be honored and remote refs
> | > created if needed.
> | 
> | Fwiw I'm in favor of that, and it was what I advocated at the time.
> | 
> | Though I think than as soon as you add an explicit remote name, like:
> | git push origin, pushing all matched references makes sense. Which is
> | also what I advocated at the time.
> 
> Indeed, it makes sense. We could then have:
> 
>   git push                 <= push the current branch on default remote
>                               (which is, at least in my case, the most
>                                frequent use I want to make of "git push",
>                                on all the projects [work or volunteer]
>                                I work on)