git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Using the --track option when creating a branch

From
Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>
Date
Oct 30, 2008, 14:23 UTC
Message-ID
<2008-10-30-15-23-16+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net>
In-Reply-To
<4909BF58.9010500@op5.se>
* Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se> [2008-10-30 15:06:16 +0100]
Show 10 quoted lines
> --all pushes all refs, even the non-matching ones, which is very
> rarely desirable and only accidentally sometimes the same as "push all
> matching refs".
>
>> I know that I've never had the intent to push all the refs without
>> thinking about it first. Most of the time, I intend to push only
>> the current branch I am in.
>
> Then say so. There's a very simple command syntax for it:
> "git push <remote> <current-branch>"

I update the branches I'm working in maybe 20 times a day, sometimes more. When I make a change and all the tests pass, I prefer to call

  git push
rather than
  git push origin 2.0-beta1

(and "2.0-beta1" is a short name here, some branches have much longer names)

I think it would be better to have :
  git push                <= push the current branch
  git push --all          <= push all matching refs
  git push --all --create <= push all matching refs, create if needed

The latest command is probably used so rarely (compared to the others) that it wouldn't be a problem to make it longer. Of course, if a refspec is given explicitely, it should be honored and remote refs created if needed.

I am curious of what other people workflows are. Do you often push multiple branches at the same time? More often than one at a time? Many times a day?

> "git pull" is actually only vaguely connected with "git push". The
> opposite of "push" is "fetch" in git lingo.

I know, but "git fetch" only updates remote tracking branches, and I think that in the majority of the cases you want to advance all the remote references. And even if you screw up, the problem will only happen in your local copy, not in an upstream or shared repository. I assume that most people "push" to public repositories and not many of them "pull" into public repositories directly.

Previous: Andreas EricssonNext: Pierre Habouzit
Message 10 of 23 in “Using the --track option when creating a branch”
  1. Bill LearOct 29, 2008
  2. Santi BéjarOct 29, 2008
  3. Bill LearOct 29, 2008
  4. Sam VilainOct 30, 2008
  5. Bill LearOct 30, 2008
  6. Bill LearOct 30, 2008
  7. Andreas EricssonOct 30, 2008
  8. Samuel TardieuOct 30, 2008
  9. Andreas EricssonOct 30, 2008
  10. Samuel TardieuOct 30, 2008
  11. Pierre HabouzitOct 30, 2008
  12. Samuel TardieuOct 30, 2008
  13. Sam VilainOct 30, 2008
  14. Andreas EricssonOct 30, 2008
  15. Samuel TardieuOct 30, 2008
  16. Andreas EricssonOct 30, 2008
  17. Bill LearOct 30, 2008
  18. Marc BranchaudOct 30, 2008
  19. Sam VilainOct 30, 2008
  20. Jakub NarebskiOct 30, 2008
  21. Jeff KingNov 2, 2008
  22. Sam VilainOct 30, 2008
  23. Santi BéjarOct 30, 2008

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.