Re: Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 5 - other SCM

From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Date: Sep 14, 2008, 10:45 UTC
Message-ID: <fcaeb9bf0809140345n11d41430ma9b4096c66776b0c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200809112214.18366.jnareb@gmail.com>

On 9/12/08, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 13 quoted lines

>  15) Do you miss features in git that you know from other SCMs?
>     If yes, what features are these (and from which SCM)?
>     (Open ended text - Essay)
>
>  Total respondents       1046 (some/many of them wrote 'no')
>  skipped this question   1249
>
>  This is just a very quick summary, based on a first few pages of
>  responses, Full analysis is I think best left for after closing the
>  survey, because I think this would be a lot of work...
>
>  So here is preliminary list, or rather beginning of one:
>   * sparse/partial checkout and clone (e.g. Perforce)

Have not read the survey result, but do you recall what is the most used term for sparse/partial checkout? What SCMs do sparse/partial checkout? I think it could be usable as it is now in my will-be-sent-again series, but I don't really know how people want it to from that.

-- 
Duy