git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 2

From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Date
Sep 4, 2008, 13:23 UTC
Message-ID
<200809041523.40601.jnareb@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To
<200809031607.19722.jnareb@gmail.com>
This is partial summary of Git User's Survey 2008 after more that 1600 
(yes, that is more 1.6 _thousands_ responses) just after the 4 days
of running the survey.  It is based on "Analysis" page for this survey:
  http://www.survs.com/shareResults?survey=M3PIVU72&rndm=OKJQ45LAG8
 
We have around 1606 individual responses (excluding 21 responses in the 
'testing' channel), as compared to 683 individual responses for 2007 
survey, and (I think) 115 answers (Base = 115) for 2006 survey. 
That is a lot, especially after so short time since staring the 
survey.
03. With which programming languages are you proficient?
Situation changed a bit since last announcement.  Nor Ruby with 59%
dominates a bit over C with 55%.  I guess this is caused by GitHub
crowd: announcement about this survey was posted on GitHub blog
(thanks defunkt!).
 
There are now 22 responses (around 1%) of "I am not a programmer".
This means that you don't need to be a programmer to use Git.

Popular (from what I have glanced) languages in the 'other' section include Erlang, Lua, OCaml, Haskell, Objective-C; there is Scala, Vala, Smalltalk, R, ActionScript, Prolog, SQL, Forth, and even TeX/LaTeX mentioned; someone even wrote Brainfuck here.

04. How did you hear about Git?

Here 'blog entry' and 'some project uses it' with 38% dominates over 'Linux kernel news' and 'word of mouth' with 22-24%.

Among 'other' there is quite popular Google Tech Talk about Git by Linus Torvalds, available on YouTube (which admittedly probably should be as one of choices), LKML (Linix kernel mailing list) which probably some put as 'Linux kernel news' and some not, FLOSS podcast, GitHub, Ruby adopting Git. Among more unique and interesting 'other' replies there is "Faculty Advisor at NSF REU" and "school Professor", "Ruby community just went apeshit all of a sudden" ;-) and "Ruby On Rails switching to git overnight"; some individual people line 'Randall Schwartz' or 'Scott Chacon'.

08. Which Git version(s) are you using? (multiple choices)

Most people use current version of git: 70% use git 1.5.x, and 40% use git 1.6.x, and only 3 people use pre 1.3.x version. Note that some people use different versions on different machines, or on different operating systems, so the numbers do not add to 100%.

Around 8% (123 replies) use 'master' branch. Sorry Junio, it looks like it wouldn't be easy to find/detect bugs as soon as they hit 'master', before releasing. (Unfortunately this survey lack question to find how many people run *-rcN (release candidate) version, but it is very long as it is with 60 questions and 55 minutes average time of answering question, and anegdotical evidence (comments) of requiring around 15 minutes to fill it without spending much time on free-form questions).

25. How do you publish/propagate your changes? (multiple choices)

Most people (92%) simply push to publishing public repository. Second is 'pull request' with 32%; I guess this includes GitHub social thingy. git-svn as form of publishing changes is third with 27%; thanks Eric Wong! Format-patch + email is only fourth with 22%, but quite close to git-svn and pull-request.

For publishing to other SCMs (32 replies, 2% or responses) people use git-bzr, git-p4, git-cvsexportcommit, git-acu (AccuRev); some publish to Mercurial, ClearCase or Visual SourceSafe.

To be continued...
P.S. Which non free-form questions are you interested most, BTW?
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
Previous: Jakub NarebskiNext: Jakub Narebski
Message 11 of 33 in “Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary”
  1. Jakub NarebskiSep 3, 2008
  2. Shawn O. PearceSep 3, 2008
  3. H.Merijn BrandSep 3, 2008
  4. Felipe ContrerasSep 3, 2008
  5. David AguilarSep 4, 2008
  6. Jan HudecSep 5, 2008
  7. David AguilarSep 6, 2008
  8. David BrownSep 3, 2008
  9. Scott ChaconSep 3, 2008
  10. Jakub NarebskiSep 3, 2008
  11. Jakub NarebskiSep 4, 2008
  12. Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 3Jakub Narebski, Sep 6, 2008
  13. Shawn O. PearceSep 6, 2008
  14. Andreas EricssonSep 6, 2008
  15. Jonas FonsecaSep 7, 2008
  16. Shawn O. PearceSep 7, 2008
  17. Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 4 - how do we use GitJakub Narebski, Sep 6, 2008
  18. Andreas EricssonSep 7, 2008
  19. Jakub NarebskiSep 7, 2008
  20. Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 5 - other SCMJakub Narebski, Sep 11, 2008
  21. Anatol PomozovSep 11, 2008
  22. Jeff KingSep 11, 2008
  23. david@lang.hmSep 11, 2008
  24. Jakub NarebskiSep 12, 2008
  25. david@lang.hmSep 13, 2008
  26. Jakub NarebskiSep 13, 2008
  27. Mark BrownSep 15, 2008
  28. Nguyen Thai Ngoc DuySep 14, 2008
  29. Jakub NarebskiSep 14, 2008
  30. david@lang.hmSep 15, 2008
  31. Andreas EricssonSep 15, 2008
  32. Jakub NarebskiSep 16, 2008
  33. Jakub NarebskiSep 11, 2008

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.