git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 5 - other SCM

From
Ddavid@lang.hm <david@lang.hm>
Date
Sep 13, 2008, 21:11 UTC
Message-ID
<alpine.DEB.1.10.0809131408010.17867@asgard.lang.hm>
In-Reply-To
<200809121244.59067.jnareb@gmail.com>
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:51, david@lang.hm wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote:
>>
> True, I have forgot that "I use this SCM" (or "I used this SCM") doesn't
> necessarily mean that one _choose_ this SCM.  One can use some SCM
> because it is SCM project uses, or because their company requires it;
> but not necessary, as git-svn and git-p4 show one can use Git, and
> make it interact with respectively Subversion and Perforce, and trying
> to make it look like one uses this other SCM.

I would expect people to still count those as using the other SCM. git-svn and git-p4 can do a lot, but they don't do everything, once in a while I would expect to need to use the native commands for the upstream SCM

Show 15 quoted lines
>> I find it interesting that the number of people who use git and the other
>> DVCS systems in so small. Is this becouse the 'market share' of those
>> other systems is small? Or becouse people who learn git aren't willing to
>> put up with other systems (or vice-versa)? Or is there some other trend
>> or tendancy that makes people who select one DVCS more likely to work on
>> similar projects, so people interested in those types of projects will
>> generally just see a single DVCS system
>
> I don't think 59% (in the example case of using currently Subversion)
> is small.  Take into account for example that there are people who (as
> seen from responses to other questions in this survey) use SCM (Git)
> only to track their private work, never publishing.  Then there are
> people who do not track (perhaps with exception of web interfaces)
> other projects development using version control systems, even if they
> do follow their development.

Subversion is not a Distributed SCM. I am pointing out the much smaller overlap between distributed SCM systems.

David Lang
Previous: Jakub NarebskiNext: Jakub Narebski
Message 25 of 33 in “Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary”
  1. Jakub NarebskiSep 3, 2008
  2. Shawn O. PearceSep 3, 2008
  3. H.Merijn BrandSep 3, 2008
  4. Felipe ContrerasSep 3, 2008
  5. David AguilarSep 4, 2008
  6. Jan HudecSep 5, 2008
  7. David AguilarSep 6, 2008
  8. David BrownSep 3, 2008
  9. Scott ChaconSep 3, 2008
  10. Jakub NarebskiSep 3, 2008
  11. Jakub NarebskiSep 4, 2008
  12. Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 3Jakub Narebski, Sep 6, 2008
  13. Shawn O. PearceSep 6, 2008
  14. Andreas EricssonSep 6, 2008
  15. Jonas FonsecaSep 7, 2008
  16. Shawn O. PearceSep 7, 2008
  17. Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 4 - how do we use GitJakub Narebski, Sep 6, 2008
  18. Andreas EricssonSep 7, 2008
  19. Jakub NarebskiSep 7, 2008
  20. Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 5 - other SCMJakub Narebski, Sep 11, 2008
  21. Anatol PomozovSep 11, 2008
  22. Jeff KingSep 11, 2008
  23. david@lang.hmSep 11, 2008
  24. Jakub NarebskiSep 12, 2008
  25. david@lang.hmSep 13, 2008
  26. Jakub NarebskiSep 13, 2008
  27. Mark BrownSep 15, 2008
  28. Nguyen Thai Ngoc DuySep 14, 2008
  29. Jakub NarebskiSep 14, 2008
  30. david@lang.hmSep 15, 2008
  31. Andreas EricssonSep 15, 2008
  32. Jakub NarebskiSep 16, 2008
  33. Jakub NarebskiSep 11, 2008

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.